Call for Your Free Consultation:
(805) 338-6880
Our Case Results

millions Recovered For Our Clients

If you've been injured, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Westlake Injury Law has procured millions of dollars on behalf of injury victims throughout the LA & Ventura Counties.  

Timing is Everything.

Do not delay in addressing your legal concerns. If your situation has gotten out of hand, contact a Ventura County lawyer at the Westlake Injury Law to learn more about how we may be able to help you.


1.5M
dollars

Drunk Driver Rear End – Auto vs. Auto Collision

We proved our client’s substantial financial loss due to lost wages resulting from a serious injury.

1.25M
dollars

Drunk Driver – Auto vs. Auto Collision

Unfortunately the drunk driver died in the collision. It was critical to preserve claims before the bar date against his probate estate. My client tried in vain for 9 months, attempting to obtain policy limits without a lawyer and was low-balled by the insurance for the at-fault deceased driver. Within 3 months of being hired we obtained all policy limits for our seriously injured client.

1M
dollars

Auto vs. School Bus Collision – Disputed Red Light

Thankfully the school bus was empty. The bus driver claimed his light was green. Through field investigation we located and secured the testimony of an eyewitness. We proved our client’s pre-existing surgical fusion was exasperated by the severe collision and obtain a fair resolution for her injuries at mediation.

650K
dollars

Premises Liability – Falling Merchandise Hits Customer vs. Retail Chain Store

While a 1.5 pound box looked innocent enough, two of them stocked negligently on a shelf flipped off and hit our client on top of her head. Her pre-existing neck condition was exasperated resulting in a surgical intervention 1 year later. Medical causation was in dispute. Our retained experts did a fantastic job establishing the causal effect of the injury to the need for surgery, allowing for a fair resolution.
over
650K
dollars

Auto vs. Police Officer Collision

While a police officer responding “Code 3” with lights and sirens on claimed he cleared the intersection appropriately, and the CHP investigated and put our client at fault for the collision, we disagreed. Through investigation in the field we obtain video evidence that the officer sped dangerously through the intersectionand caused the collision. The County of Ventura faced with the video evidence acknowledged their officer’s fault and fairly compensated our client for his injuries.

450K
dollars

Solo Motorcycle Collision – Injured Test Rider vs. Harley Davidson Dealership

In the Case of First Impression (Meaning a First of Its Kind), we obtained a substantial resolution for our client who was injured in a solo motorcycle collisionwhile on a test ride. He had a motorcycle operators license and signed a waiver of negligence liability release. However, we discovered and presented critical evidence that could support a finding of Gross Negligence by the motorcycle dealership and were able to obtain fair compensation for our client despite the liability waiver he signed.

165K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto – Disputed Head-on Collision, and vs. California Department of Transportation

An at-fault driver, unfamiliar with the winding mountain road, came around a corner too fast, crossed over the line and hit our client’s car head-on. Although the driver claimed he did not cross over the line, we proved he did. We later obtained additional damages against the CA DOT due to negligent maintenance of the roadway and the signage warning drivers of the impending hairpin turn.

150K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto - Rear End Collision

We proved our clients substantial damages and explained the delay in treatment due to an intervening cancer diagnosis.

100K
dollars

Trip and Fall down stairs vs. Building Owner and Manager

We proved our client’s substantial injuries due to the dangerous condition of a stairway.

100K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision

The at-fault driver pulled in to traffic in front of our client who had the right-of-way
over
100K
dollars

Auto vs. Truck Collision – Disputed Red Light

At a notorious intersection in Moorpark, known for trucks running red lights, our client was hit by a truck running a red light. The truck driver claimed our client ran the red light! Despite no independent witnesses, we used forensic evidence pulled from the vehicles on-board Event Data Recorders to prove what really happened.

100K
dollars

Premises Liability – Child Hit by Falling Lamppost vs. HOA and Property Owner

The common area of a condo complex was so poorly maintained that a lamppost rusted at the base collapsed on a small child. While her injuries were mostly emotional trauma, we used forensic evidence to prove the likelihood of the need for future care. An inspection by the expert metallurgist we retained proved the dangerous condition of the lampposts throughout the common areas of the complex. We also structured the settlement such that it would grow tax free over the next 12 years until she needs it for college.

100K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision

We proved our client’s financial losses and future losses due to sustained injury and the likelihood a future surgery would be needed.

95K
dollars

Drunk Driver – Auto vs. Auto Collision

While mostly soft-tissue damages with reasonable non-invasive treatment. We appropriately used the fact that the defendant was drunk to obtain a very fair resolution for our client.
over
95K
dollars

Motorcycle vs. Auto Collision

We proved in a disputed fact pattern, that our client was cut-off.

90K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto - Rear End Collision

Despite minimal $1,000 in property damage to our client’s rear bumper, we proved an exasperation of a serious pre-existing condition to obtain a fair result for our client.

75K
dollars

Slip and Fall vs. Hotel Operator

Our client fell on a walkway that was wet due to a negligently maintained sprinkler system.
over
75K
dollars

Slip and Fall vs. Grocery Store

We obtained and used critical video evidence to prove disputed liability and obtain a fair resolution for our client.

70K
dollars

Drunk Driver – Auto vs. Auto Collision

We appropriately used the fact that the defendant was intoxicated to ensure our injured client was fairly compensated.
over
60K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision

We obtained a fair resolution for our client who sustained an exasperation of a pre-existing surgical condition.
over
55K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision

We proved our client’s injuries would require future care not yet obtained to achieve a fair result.

50K
dollars

Auto vs. Garbage Truck Collision

Our previously injured client suffered an exasperation of that condition. We obtained fair compensation for that exasperation.

50K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision – Disputed Red Light

While the defendant admitted she looked down to the police, she claimed to her insurance company her light was green. Through depositions and other evidence developed through litigation, her insurance company increased their offer from $1,000 before we were involved to the $50,000 accepted.

50K
dollars

Motorcycle vs. Auto Collision

While merging onto the freeway on-ramp a negligent driver bumped our client off the road causing injuries. We proved the at-fault driver’s claim that our client crossed into her lane was false.

50K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto – Rear end Collision

Our client’s treatment was challenged as unreasonable. We proved it was not and obtained fair compensation.

50K
Dollars

Auto vs. Auto - Disputed Right-Of-Way Collision

We obtained the policy limit from the at-fault driver’s insurance although our client’s insurer had previously accepted liability and claimed our client was at-fault. We can protect your interests, even when your insurer has failed to fairly assess the facts of the collision.

50K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto - Disputed Right-Of-Way Collision Pedestrian vs. Vehicle Collision

We proved our client had the right-of-way.
over
47K
dollars

Auto vs. Auto Collision – vs. underinsured rental car driver

We proved liability and obtained the at-fault’s policy limits and our client’s Under Insured Motorist policy benefits.
over
35K
dollars

Parking Lot Collision

We proved liability with photographic evidence and measurements of the vehicles involved in a disputed collision when the at-fault hit our client’s vehicle door as she emerged to exit her vehicle at the same time the at-fault driver was pulling in to the adjacent spot.
Call An Attorney
uploadmagnifiercrossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram